Methodological Approach to Study the Factors of Adolescents’ Pro-environmental Behavior: Emerging Need of Mixed Methods Research
Abstract views: 21
/ 
PDF downloads: 38
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59455/jomes.52Keywords:
pro-environmental behavior, quantitative, qualitative, mixed methodsAbstract
Identifying the factors influencing pro-environmental behavior among adolescents is crucial. Several studies have explored these factors using various methodologies, but the research designs used in those studies have not been systematically examined. To address this gap, a review of previous studies was conducted. The results reveal that most past research has relied on quantitative methods. Given the complexity of pro-environmental behavior, a deeper exploration necessitates mixed methods research. Mixed methods research offers a more comprehensive understanding, broadens the scope of the study, provides complementary insights, and enhances validity through triangulation. This article is vital for guiding future researchers in examining the determinants of pro-environmental behavior using mixed methods research.
References
Ahmad, A., Garg, S., Kirmani, M. D., & Madsen, D. Ø. (2024). Factors determining curtailment behaviour of youths: moderating role of government policies. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1332422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332422
Balkenberg, A. K., & Alhusen, H. (2019). On the determinants of pro-environmental behavior: A literature review and guide for the empirical economist. Center for European, Governance, and Economic Development Research (CEGE), (350). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3473702
Balundė, A., Perlaviciute, G., & Truskauskaitė-Kunevičienė, I. (2020). Sustainability in youth: Environmental considerations in adolescence and their relationship to pro-environmental behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 582920. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582920
Barszcz, S. J., Oleszkowicz, A. M., Bąk, O., & Słowińska, A. M. (2023). The role of types of motivation, life goals, and beliefs in pro-environmental behavior: The Self-Determination Theory perspective. Current Psychology, 42(21), 17789-17804. https://10.1007/s12144-022-02995-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02995-2
Benz, C. R., & Newman, I. (2008). Mixed methods research: Exploring the interactive continuum. SIU Press.
Bezrukova, T. L., Larionov, V. G., & Kuksova, I. V. (2019, November). Analytical assessment of social, environmental and economic indicators for the balanced development of the economy of the region. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 392, No. 1, p. 012058). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/392/1/012058/pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/392/1/012058
Bhattarai, P. C., Shrestha, R., Ray, S., & Knez, R. (2024). Determinants of adolescents’ pro-sustainable behavior: a systematic literature review using PRISMA. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 112. 10.1007/s43621-024-00291-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00291-6
Becht, A., Spitzer, J., Grapsas, S., van de Wetering, J., Poorthuis, A., Smeekes, A., & Thomaes, S. (2024). Feeling anxious and being engaged in a warming world: climate anxiety and adolescents' pro‐environmental behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. doi:10.1111/jcpp.14035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/a9k5h
Brown, J., & Krettenauer, T. (2025). Contrasting trajectories in adolescent pro-environmentalism: Qualitative differences between “Engagers” versus “Disengagers”. Sustainability, 17(2), 389. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020389
Butnaru, G. I., Niţă, V., Melinte, C., Anichiti, A., & Brînză, G. (2022). The nexus between sustainable behaviour of tourists from generation z and the factors that influence the protection of environmental quality. Sustainability, 14(19), 12103. doi.org/10.3390/su141912103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912103
Buttigieg, K., & Pace, P. (2013). Positive youth action towards climate change. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 15(1), 15-47. doi: 10.2478/jtes-2013-0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2013-0002
Chan, S., Singh, S., Chang, K., Tailor, P., Joshi, M., Mohan, M., & Amposen, J. (2021). Young People and Drivers and Barriers to Climate Adaptation Action. Report. Global Center on Adaptation (GCA)/Centre for Environment Education (CEE)/Kai Analytics/Foundation for Environmental Education (FEE), Rotterdam/Ahmedabad/Vancouver/Copenhagen.
Chen, W., Cao, C., Fang, X., & Kang, Z. (2019). Expanding the theory of planned behaviour to reveal urban residents’ pro-environment travel behaviour. Atmosphere, 10(8), 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10080467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10080467
Costa, T., Sampaio, F., Teixeira-Santos, L., Guedes de Pinho, L., Sequeira, C., Luís, S., ... & Stanley, S. K. (2023). Validating a measure for eco-anxiety in Portuguese young adults and exploring its associations with environmental action. BMC Public Health, 2023, vol. 23, num. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16816-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16816-z
Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed. CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 3rd ed. Sage.
Creswell, J. W., and Plano Clark V.L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2nd ed. Sage.
Creswell J. W., & Plano Clark V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
Dąbrowski, L. S., Środa-Murawska, S., Smoliński, P., & Biegańska, J. (2022). Rural–urban divide: Generation Z and pro-environmental behaviour. Sustainability, 14(23), 16111. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316111
Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage.
Eichinger, M., Bechtoldt, M., Bui, I. T. M., Grund, J., Keller, J., Lau, A. G., ... & Heinzel, S. (2022). Evaluating the public climate school—A school-based programme to promote climate awareness and action in students: Protocol of a cluster-controlled pilot study. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(13), 8039. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138039
Eisenberg, N., Carlo, G., Murphy, B., & Van Court, P. (1995). Prosocial development in late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 66(4), 1179–1197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00930.x
Ghiara, V. (2020). Disambiguating the role of paradigms in mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 14(1), 11-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818819928
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research synthesis methods, 11(2), 181-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
Fang, W. T., Ng, E., Liu, S. M., Chiang, Y. T., & Chang, M. C. (2021). Determinants of pro-environmental behavior among excessive smartphone usage children and moderate smartphone usage children in Taiwan. PeerJ, 9, e11635. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11635 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11635
Hauken, M. A., Larsen, T. M. B., & Holsen, I. (2019). ‘‘Back on track’’: A longitudinal mixed methods study on the rehabilitation of young adult cancer survivors. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(3), 339-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817698553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817698553
Hoare, G., Leneuyia, K., Higgins, P., & Lowerikoi, J. (2022). Wildlife and indigenous communities in Kenya: The influence of conservation education in supporting co-existence between wildlife and a Maasai community. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 38. 10.4314/sajee.v38i1.08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/sajee.v38i.08
Hosany, A. S., Hosany, S., & He, H. (2022). Children sustainable behaviour: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 147, 236-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.008
Ivankova, N., & Wingo, N. (2018). Applying mixed methods in action research: Methodological potentials and advantages. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 978-997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772673
Janakiraman, S., Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., & Shepardson, D. P. (2021). Exploring the influence of digital games on environmental attitudes and behaviours based on the new ecological paradigm scale: a mixed-methods study in India. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 15(1), 72-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408221997844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408221997844
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage publications.
Kaushik, V., & Walsh, C. A. (2019). Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research. Social sciences, 8(9), 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255
Kővári, E., Formádi, K., & Banász, Z. (2023). The green attitude of four European capitals of culture’s youth. Sustainability, 15(10), 7866. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107866
Krettenauer, T. (2017). Pro‐environmental behavior and adolescent moral development. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(3), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12300
Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Publications.
Li, C., Agyeiwaah, E., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Understanding tourists’ eco-paralysis, environmental concern, and pro-environmental behavior: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2266778
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339(jul21 1), b2700–b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
Loomis, D., & Maxwell, J. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Ma, L., Shahbaz, P., Haq, S. U., & Boz, I. (2023). Exploring the moderating role of environmental education in promoting a clean environment. Sustainability, 15(10), 8127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108127
Marchetti, V., Panno, A., Scopelliti, M., Romano, L., Angelini, G., Rinallo, E., ... & Fiorilli, C. (2024). Trait emotional intelligence and ecological outcomes: the role of connectedness to nature. BMC psychology, 12(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01679-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01679-9
Morgan, D. L. (2014). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544304533
Morse, J. M. & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11577-017-0454-1
Nongqayi, L., Risenga, I., & Dukhan, S. (2022). Youth’s knowledge and awareness of human contribution to climate change: the influence of social and cultural contexts within a developing country. Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 39(1), 44-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2022.2050461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2022.2050461
Nor, M. F., Eliyana, A., & Sridadi, A. R. (2023). Systematic literature review: The importance of work motivation to employee performance. Jurnal Pamator: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo, 16(1), 34-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v16i1.19060
Oludoye, O. O., & Supakata, N. (2024). Breaking the plastic habit: Drivers of single-use plastic reduction among Thai university students. Plos one, 19(5), e0299877. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299877
Oinonen, I., & Paloniemi, R. (2023). Understanding and measuring young people’s sustainability actions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 91, 102124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102124
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj, 372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Palupi, T. & Sawitri, D. R. (2018). The importance of PEB in adolescents. E3S Web of Conference, 31.
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183109031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183109031
Pickering, G. J., Schoen, K., & Botta, M. (2021). Lifestyle decisions and climate mitigation: Current action and behavioural intent of youth. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 26(6), 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-021-09963-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-021-09963-4
Pielke Jr, R. A. (2004). What is climate change?. Energy & environment, 15(3), 515-520. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958305041494576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1260/0958305041494576
Plano Clark, V. L. & Ivankova, N. V. (2016). Mixed methods research. A guide to the field. Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398341
Poth, C., & Munce, S. E. P. (2020). Commentary—Preparing today’s researchers for a yet unknown tomorrow: Promising practices for a synergistic and sustainable mentoring approach to mixed methods research learning. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 12, 56-64. https://doi.org/10.29034/ijmra.v12n1commentary DOI: https://doi.org/10.29034/ijmra.v12n1commentary
Pradana, M., Silvianita, A., Madiawati, P. N., Calandra, D., Lanzalonga, F., & Oppioli, M. (2023). A guidance to systematic literature review to young researchers by Telkom University and the University of Turin. To Maega: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 6(2), 409-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35914/tomaega.v6i2.1915
Raghoebar, S., Mesch, A., Gulikers, J., Winkens, L. H., Wesselink, R., & Haveman-Nies, A. (2024). Experts' perceptions on motivators and barriers of healthy and sustainable dietary behaviors among adolescents: The SWITCH project. Appetite, 194, 107196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.107196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.107196
Rahmania, T. (2024). Exploring school environmental psychology in children and adolescents: The influence of environmental and psychosocial factors on sustainable behavior in Indonesia. Heliyon, 10(18). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37881
Repetto, M., Bianco Prevot, A., Brizio, A., Boldi, A., Talarico, M., Stanchi, S., ... & Acquadro Maran, D. (2024). Digital escape rooms: A resource for environmental education. Sustainability, 16(19), 8525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198525
Salehi, K. & Golafshani, N. (2010). Using mixed methods in research studies: An opportunity with its challenges. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(3), 186-191. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.3.186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.3.186
Salimath, P., Kim, R., Andoh, J., Lee, Y., & Chang, J. B. (2024). Factors influencing forest resource conservation behavior of the youth in Northern Uplands, Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Sustainability, 16(24), 11271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411271
Sannino, M., Galli, E., Zacheo, C., & Giancola, M. (2024). Be divergent, be green! The moderating role of gender in the association between divergent thinking and pro-environmental behaviours in children. Children, 11(12), 1497. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121497
Šaparnienė, D., Mejerė, O., Raišutienė, J., Juknevičienė, V., & Rupulevičienė, R. (2022). Expression of behavior and attitudes toward sustainable tourism in the youth population: A search for statistical types. Sustainability, 14(1), 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010473
Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(Suppl 2), 107. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11577-017-0454-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
Sharma, A., & Bhattarai, P. C. (2022). Mixed methods research in employability discourse: A systematic literature review using PRISMA. Education Research International, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4848220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4848220
Shorten A., & Smith J. (2017). Mixed methods research: Expanding the evidence base. Evid Based Nurs, 20, 74–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102699
Stevenson, K. T., Nils Peterson, M., & Bondell, H. D. (2018). Developing a model of climate change behavior among adolescents. Climatic Change, 151(3–4), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2313-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2313-0
Tashakkori, A., &Teddlie, C. (2008). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches In the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage Publications.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2011). Mixed methods research. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4, 285-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810382532
Torkar, G., Fabijan, T., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). Students’ care for dogs, environmental attitudes, and behaviour. Sustainability, 12(4), 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041317
Tran, P. M., Nguyen, T., Nguyen, H. D., Thinh, N. A., Lam, N. D., Huyen, N. T., & Khuc, V. Q. (2024). Improving green literacy and environmental culture associated with youth participation in the circular economy: A case study of Vietnam. Urban Science, 8(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8020063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8020063
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
UNICEF. (2023). Adolescents. https://data.unicef.org/topic/adolescents/overview/#:~:text=Defined%20by%20the%20United%20Nations,it%2C%20significant%20growth%20and%20development
United Nations. (2023). Causes and effects of climate change. United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/causes-effects-climate-change
Uitto, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Saloranta, S. (2015). Participatory school experiences as facilitators for adolescents’ ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.007
Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 21-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02
Vercammen, A., Oswald, T., & Lawrance, E. (2023). Psycho-social factors associated with climate distress, hope and behavioural intentions in young UK residents. PLOS Global Public Health, 3(8), e0001938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001938
Verma, S. (2017). Niche level segmentation of green consumers: A key for psychographic or demographic predicament. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 6(3), 274-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-05-2016-0040
Wehden, S., Garber, H., Aichinger, M., Hempel, E., Creutzig, F., & Janda, K. B. (2025). Choosing photovoltaics installation as a job emerges as a pro-environmental behaviour in the context of low-carbon transitions' skill shortages in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production, 491, 144534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144534 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144534
Wu, G., Hong, J., & Thakuriah, P. (2019). Assessing the relationships between young adults’ travel and use of the internet over time. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 125, 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.05.002
Zhang, M., Zhang, W., & Shi, Y. (2023). Are happier adolescents more willing to protect the environment? Empirical evidence from Programme for International Student Assessment 2018. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1157409. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1157409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1157409
Zikmund, W. G., D'alessandro, S., Winzar, H., Lowe, B., & Babin, B. (2014). Marketing research. Cengage Learning.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Mixed Methods Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
