Habermas, Honneth, Critical Theory, and Ideology Critique for Transformative Mixed Methods Research
Abstract views: 24
/ 
PDF downloads: 11
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59455/jomes.53Keywords:
transformative mixed methods research, Habermas, Honneth, critical theory, ideology critique, mixed methods research, social justice, communicative action, recognition, ideal speech situationAbstract
This article sets a theoretical foundation to transformative mixed methods research that is rooted in the critical theory of Habermas and Honneth. This addresses Habermas’s knowledge-constitutive interests and communicative action for redressing societal pathologies, and Honneth’s work on (mis)recognition, (dis)respect, and social justice. In doing so, the article argues for broadening the scope and embrace of mixed methods research, to go beyond being empirical research only or largely, and to include theorisation, critical theoretical discourse and its analysis, and ideology critique, as legitimate methods for (transformative) mixed methods research. The article makes a case for these methods as constituting important research methods in themselves in the portfolio of mixed methods research, moving the boundaries of mixed methods research beyond solely empirical studies, and providing emancipatory lenses and consciousness-raising in recognising that transformation takes many forms.
References
Barnes, B. (2019). Transformative mixed methods research in South Africa: Contributions to social justice. In S. Layer, A. Flynn, & S. Kramer (Eds.) Transforming research methods in the social sciences: case studies from South Africa (pp. 303-316). Wits University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18772/22019032750.24
Barnhardt, C. L., Reyes, K., Vidal Rodriguez, A., & Ramos, M. (2018). A transformative mixed methods assessment of educational access and opportunity for undocumented college students in the Southeastern United States. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(4), 413-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816652764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816652764
Bernstein, R. J. (1976). The restructuring of social and political theory. Basil Blackwell.
Bernstein, R. J. (1985). Habermas and modernity. Polity Press with Basil Blackwell.
Bernstein, R. J. (1992). The new constellation: The ethical-political horizons of modernist/postmodernity. MIT Press.
Bletscher, C. G., & Galindo, S. (2024). Challenges with using transformative mixed methods research among vulnerable populations: Reflections from a study among US-resettled refugees. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(2), 165-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231174578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231174578
Bonell, C., & Melendez-Torres, G. J. (2023). Using Habermas’ theory of communicative action to transform sociological analyses of evidence-based policy. Critical Public Health, 33(4), 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2023.2204182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2023.2204182
Boudon, R. (1989). The analyzis of ideology (trans. M. Slater). Polity Press.
Bramley, C. E., & Morrison, K. R. B. (2023). Student engagement, higher education, and social justice. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003331292
Bubner, R. (1982). Habermas’s concept of critical theory. In J. B. Thompson & D. Held (Eds.) Habermas: Critical debates (pp. 42-56). Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16763-0_3
Camacho, S. (2020). From theory to practice: Operationalizing transformative mixed methods with and for the studied population. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 305-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819872614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819872614
Caraballo, L., Lozenski, B. D., Lyiscott, J. J., & Morrell, E. (2017). YPAR and critical epistemologies: Rethinking education research. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 311-336. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16686948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16686948
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical. Falmer.
Chiang, K. M., Yin, H. B., Lee, I., & Chang, C. H. (2024). Taking stock of the research into professional learning communities: Paradigms, pathways, and possibilities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 139(March 2024), 104431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104431
Chilisa, B. (2005). Educational research within postcolonial Africa: A critique of HIV/AIDS research in Botswana. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(6), 659-684. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500298170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500298170
Chilisa, B., & Mertens, D. M. (2021). Indigenous Made in Africa evaluation frameworks: Addressing epistemic violence and contributing to social transformation. American Journal of Evaluation, 42(2), 241-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020948601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020948601
Chilisa, B., & Tsheko, G. N. (2014). Mixed methods in indigenous research: Building relationships for sustainable intervention outcomes. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 222-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527878
Cole, R. M., & Heinecke, W. F. (2020). Higher education after neoliberalism: Student activism as a guiding light. Policy Futures in Education, 18(1) 90-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210318767459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210318767459
Cooper, D. (1994). Productive, relational and everywhere? Conceptualising power and resistance within Foucauldian feminism. Sociology, 28(2), 435-454. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42857701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038594028002005
Cram, F., & Mertens, D. (2015). Transformative and indigenous frameworks for multimethod and mixed methods research. In S. Hesse-Biber & R. Burke Johnson (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 91-109). Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933624.013.7
Cram, F., & Mertens, D. M. (2016). Negotiating solidarity between indigenous and transformative paradigms in evaluation. Evaluation Matters—He Take Tõ Te Aromatawai, 2, 161–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.18296/em.0015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18296/em.0015
Deranty, J-P. (2009). Beyond communication: A critical study of Axel Honneth’s social philosophy. Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004175778.i-502
Draper-Rodi, J., Abbey, H., Hammond, J., Thompson, O. P., Brownhill, K., MacMillan, A., Fabusuyi, Y., & Vogel, S. (2024). Overcoming barriers to equality, diversity, inclusivity, and sense of belonging in healthcare education: the Underrepresented Groups’ Experiences in Osteopathic Training (UrGEnT) mixed methods study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 468. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05404-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05404-3
du Plessis, G. E. (2019). Reflexive encountering and postgraduate research training in South Africa. Education as Change, 23(1), 1-25. https://dx.doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/5037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/5037
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2014). Language and Power (3rd edition). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838250
Flecha, R. (2014). Using mixed methods from a communicative orientation: Researching with grassroots Roma. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527945
Fleming, T. (2014). Axel Honneth and the struggle for recognition: Implications for transformative learning. In A. Nicolaides & D. Holt (Eds.) Spaces of Transformation and Transformation of Space. Proceedings of the 11th International Transformative Learning Conference (pp. 318-324). Teachers College, Columbia University.
Fleming, T. (2016a). The critical theory of Axel Honneth: Implications for transformative learning and higher education. In V. Wang & P. Cranton (Eds.) Theory and practice of adult and higher education (pp. 63-85). Information Age Publishing.
Fleming, T. (2016b). Reclaiming the emancipatory potential of adult education: Honneth’s critical theory and the struggle for recognition. European journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 7(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9077
Fleming, T. (2017). Transformative learning and higher education: Making critical theory useful. Paper presented at the University of Edinburgh, conference at the Institute of Academic Development. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316740449_Transformative_learning_and_higher_education_Making_critical_theory_useful
Fleming, T. (2022a). Transformative learning and critical theory: Making connections with Habermas, Honneth, and Negt. In A. Nicolaides, S. Eschenbacher, P. T. Buergelt, Y. Gilpin-Jackson, M. Welch, & M. Misawa (Eds.) The Palgrave handbook of learning for transformation (pp. 4-14). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429450600-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84694-7_2
Fleming, T. (2022b). Transforming everyday experience: Transformative learning, disorienting dilemmas and Honneth’s theory of recognition. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 52(4), 563-578. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12355
Fleming, T. (2024). Experience and sociological imagination: Transforming the researcher’s learner identity. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 15(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.4841 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.4841
Fleming, T., & Finnegan, F. (2010). Honneth and recognition as sensitizing concept for narrative analysis. RANLHE discussion paper #2 from NUIM. 135230-LLP-1-UK-KA11SCR. http://www.ranlhe.dsw.edu.pl/files/Honneth_and_Recognition.pdf
Fleming, T., & Finnegan, F. (2014). Critical theory and non-traditional students in Irish higher education. In F. Finnegan, B. Merrill, & C. Thunborg (Eds.) Student voices on inequalities in European higher education (pp. 51-62). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203526088
Flynn, J. (2008). Review of Disrespect: The normative foundations of critical theory by Axel Honneth. International Philosophical Quarterly, 48(4), 552-555. https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq200848475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq200848475
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810503
Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., & Schram, S. (2012). Real social science: Applied phronesis. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511719912
Foster, R. (1999). Recognition and resistance: Axel Honneth’s critical social theory. Radical Philosophy, 94, 6-18. https://www.radicalphilosophyarchive.com/issue-files/rp94_article1_recognitionresistance_foster.pdf
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction. Penguin.
Foucault, M. (2000). Power: Essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984, (Volume III) (J. D. Faubion (Ed.)). The New York Press.
Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition: A political-philosophical exchange. Verso.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin.
Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy and civic courage. Rowman and Littlefield.
Freshwater, D., & Fisher, P. (2015). Mixed methods: Dissonance and values in research with marginalized groups. In S. Hesse-Biber & R. Burke Johnson (Eds.) (2015). The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 665-676). Oxford University Press.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. Polity Press.
Garnett, B. R., Smith, L. C., Kervick, C. T., Ballysingh, T. A., Moore, M. & Gonell, E. (2019). The emancipatory potential of transformative mixed methods designs: Informing youth participatory action research and restorative practices within a district-wide school transformation project. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(3), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1598355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1598355
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4
Giles, D. (2020). Rethinking misrecognition and struggles for recognition: Critical theory beyond Honneth. Insert Philosophy.
Giroux, H. A. (2011). Education and the crisis of public values: Challenging the assault on teachers, students, and public education. Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
Giroux, H. A. (2013). Hope in the age of looming authoritarianism. Truthout, 2 December 2013. https://truthout.org/articles/hope-in-the-age-of-looming-authoritarianism/
Giroux, H. A. (2014). Higher education after neoliberalism. Haymarket Books.
Giroux, H.A. (2020). Neoliberalism’s war on higher education (2nd. edition). Haymarket Books.
Goodyear-Smith, F., & Ofanoa, M. (2022). Fa’afaletui: A Pacific research framework. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820985948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820985948
Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis. Falmer Press.
Gunbayi, I. (2020). Knowledge-constitutive interests and social paradigms in guiding mixed methods research (MMR). Journal of Mixed Methods Studies, 1, 44-56. www.jomesonline.com https://doi.org/10.14689/jomes.2020.1.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59455/jomes.2020.1.3
Habermas, J. (1970a). On systematically distorted communication. Inquiry, 13(3), 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747008601590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747008601590
Habermas, J. (1970b). Towards a theory of communicative competence. Inquiry, 13(4), 360-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747008601597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747008601597
Habermas, J. (1971). Towards a rational society (trans. J. Shapiro). Macmillan.
Habermas J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests (trans. J. Shapiro). Heinemann.
Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and practice (trans. J. Viertel). Heinemann.
Habermas, J. (1976). Legitimation crisis (trans. T. McCarthy). Heinemann.
Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Heinemann.
Habermas, J. (1982). A reply to my critics. In J. Thompson, & D. Held (Eds.) Habermas: Critical debates (pp. 219-283). Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16763-0_13
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. volume one: Reason and the rationalization of society (trans. T. McCarthy). Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1987a). The theory of communicative action, volume two: Lifeworld and system, (trans. T. McCarthy). Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1987b). The philosophical discourse of modernity. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Habermas, J. (1990a). Moral consciousness and communicative action (trans. C. Lenhardt & S. Nicholsen). Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Habermas, J. (1990b). Justice and solidarity: On the discussion concerning Stage 6. In T. Wren (Ed.) The moral domain: Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social sciences (pp. 224-251). MIT Press.
Heller, A. (1982). Habermas and Marxism. In J. Thompson, & D. Held (Eds.) Habermas: Critical debates (pp. 21-41). Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16763-0_2
Herrman, S. (2021). Misrecognizing recognition: Foundations of a critical theory of recognition. Critical Horizons, 22(1), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2021.1886670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2021.1886670
Hesse-Biber, S., & Burke Johnson, R. (Eds.) (2015). The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry. Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933624.001.0001
Hoang, H. T. N., & Romm, N. R. A. (2020). Systemic research practices towards the development of an eco-community in Vietnam. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 33(6), 599-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-020-09533-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-020-09533-w
Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts (translated by J. Anderson). Polity Press.
Honneth, A. (2001). Recognition or redistribution? Changing perspectives on the moral order of society. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(2), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760122051779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760122051779
Honneth, A. (2014). Disrespect: The normative foundations of critical theory. Polity Press.
Honneth, A., & Markle, G. (2004). From struggles for recognition to a plural concept of justice: An interview with Axel Honneth. Acta Sociologica, 47(4), 383-391. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4195052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699304048674
Iser, M. (2019). Recognition. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/recognition DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316771303.100
Keat, R. (1981). The politics of social theory. Basil Blackwell.
Kolenick, P. (2021). Communicative space and the emancipatory interests of action research. Action Research, 19(2), 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750317699461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750317699461
Kompridis, N. (2007). Struggling over the meaning of recognition: A matter of identity, justice, or freedom? European Journal of Political Theory, 6(3), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885107077311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885107077311
Larrain, J. (1994). Ideology and cultural identity. Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell Publishers.
Leach Sankofa, N. (2022). Transformativist measurement development methodology: A mixed methods approach to scale construction. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(3), 307-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211033698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211033698
Lepold, K. (2019). Examining Honneth’s positive theory of recognition. Critical Horizons, 20(1), 246-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2019.1644810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2019.1644810
Ling, H. L., & Pang, M. F. (2022). A vignette-based transformative multiphase mixed methods interventional study featuring Venn diagram joint displays: Financial education with Hong Kong early adolescent ethnic minority students. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689821989834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689821989834
Lovat, T. (2013). Jürgen Habermas: Education’s reluctant hero. In M. Murphy (Ed.) Social theory and education research: Understanding Foucault, Habermas, Bourdieu and Derrida (pp. 69-83). Routledge.
Lubis, D.S., Conn, C., & Andajani, S. (2022). Participatory action research to co-design internet-based HIV prevention with young men who have sex with men in HIV prevention in Bali, Indonesia. Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 10(E), 142612433. https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/10622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.10622
Lucero, J., Wallerstein, N., Duran, B., Alegria, M., Greene-Moton, E., Israel, B., Kastelic, S., Magarati, M., Oetzel, J., Pearson, C., Schulz, A., Villegas, M., White Hat, E.R. (2018). Development of a mixed methods investigation of process and outcomes of community-based participatory research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(1), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816633309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816633309
Lukes, S. (1977). Essays in social theory. Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15729-7
Maleku, A., Kim, Y. K., Kagotho, N., & Lim, Y. (2021). Expanding the transformative explanatory sequential mixed methods design archetype in a cross-cultural context: The polemics of African refugee livelihoods in places of resettlement. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 212-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820936378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820936378
Martel, R., Shepherd, M., & Goodyear-Smith, F. (2022). He awa whiria—A “Braided River”: An indigenous Māori approach to mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820984028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820984028
Masschelein, J. (1991). The relevance of Habermas’s communicative turn. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 11(2), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372426
Mavi, D., Ayyıldız, P., & Özdemir, M. (2022). Knowledge production in the field of educational administration in Turkey: Evaluation of dissertations within the context of Habermas’ knowledge taxonomy. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 7(2), 283-318. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.919630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30828/real.919630
McNay, L. (2008). Against recognition. Polity Press.
Mertens, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformative-emancipatory perspective. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 135-164). Sage.
Mertens, D. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302811
Mertens, D. (2008). Transformative research and evaluation. The Guilford Press.
Mertens, D. M. (2010). Transformative mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 469-474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364612
Mertens, D. M. (2022). Mixed methods integration for transformative purposes. In A. J. Onwuegbuzie & J. H. Hitchcock (Eds.) The Routledge handbook for advancing integration in mixed methods research (pp. 71-85). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429432828-7
Miller, D. R. (2022). Tacit cultural knowledge: An instrumental qualitative case study of mixed methods research in South Africa. In P. Ngulube (Ed.) Handbook of research on mixed methods research in information science (pp. 222-244). IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8844-4.ch012
Morrison, K. R. B. (2021). Taming randomized controlled trials in education. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003042112
Murphy, M., & Fleming, T. (2010). Habermas, critical theory and education. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864890
Naga, J. F., Isaguirre, J., Vizconde, E., & Sison, R. (2024). Breaking the code of silence: A qualitative exploration of cyberbullying through the lens of Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 12(3), 14-35. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTAP.2024.12.3.2
Nastasi, B. L. (2022). Designing integrated ethnograph approaches. In J. H. Hitchcock & A., Onwuegbuzie (Eds.) The Routledge handbook for advancing integration in mixed methods research (pp. 113-123). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429432828-11
Nielsen, K. (1992). On the status of critical theory. Interchange, 23(3), 265-284. https://www.kainielsen.org/uploads/1/1/9/0/119098149/on_the_status_of_critical_theory.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01450187
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Hitchcock, J. H. (Eds.) (2022) The Routledge handbook for advancing integration in mixed methods research. Routledge.
Outhwaite. W. (2009). Habermas (2nd. edition). Polity Press.
Provinzano, K. T., Sondergeld, T. A., & Knaggs, C. M. (2020). Community schools as a sustainable comprehensive school reform strategy: A transformative mixed methods perspective. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 32(1), Article 2. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/mwer/vol32/iss1/2
Puigvert, L., Valls, R., Garcia Yeste, C., Aguilar, C., & Merrill, B. (2019). Resistance to and transformations of gender-based violence in Spanish universities: A communicative evaluation of social impact. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(3), 361-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817731170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817731170
Rensijing (刘任思静), L., & Hongbiao (尹弘飚), Y. (2023). Three approaches to the inquiry into teacher identity: A narrative review enlightened by Habermas’s human interests. ECNU Review of Education, 6(1), 57-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221106224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221106224
Roderick, R., (1986). Habermas and the foundations of critical theory. Heinemann.
Romero-Vasquez, G. (2021). Exploring suburban agroecological agriculture and its contribution to food sovereignty and food security in socialist Cuba. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Coventry university, UK. https://pureportal.coventry.ac.uk/files/54013747/Romero_Vasquez2022.pdf
Romm, N. R. A. (2015a). Conducting focus groups in terms of an appreciation of Indigenous ways of knowing: Some examples from South Africa. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(1) (Art. 2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_46-1
Romm, N. R. A. (2015b). Reviewing the transformative paradigm: A critical systemic and (Indigenous) lens. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(5), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-015-9344-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-015-9344-5
Romm, N. R. A. (2018). Responsible research practice: Revisiting transformative paradigm in social research. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74386-8
Shannon-Baker, P. (2016). Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(4), 319-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815575861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815575861
Slocum, J., & Rhoads, R. A. (2009). Faculty and student engagement in the Argentine grassroots rebellion: Toward a democratic and emancipatory vision of the university. Higher Education, 57(1), 85-105. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40269108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9134-4
Sweetman, D., Badiee, M., & Creswell, J. W. (2010). Use of the transformative framework in mixed methods studies. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 441-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364610
Tartaglia, A. M. (2020). The potential impact of online learning on economically disadvantaged students. Kutztown University, Education Doctorate Dissertations. 9. https://research.library.kutztown.edu/edddissertations/9
Thompson, J. B. (1982). Universal pragmatics. In J. Thompson & D. Held (Eds.) Habermas: Critical debates (pp. 116-133). Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16763-0_7
Thompson, J. B., & Held, D. (Eds.) (1982). Habermas: Critical debates. Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16763-0
Ungar, M., McGrath, P., Black, D., Sketris, I, Whitman, S. & Liebenberg, L. (2015). Contribution of participatory action research to knowledge and mobilization in mental health services for children and families. Qualitative Social Work, 14(5), 599-614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325014566842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325014566842
Urquhart, L., Brown, L., Duncanson, K., Roberts, K., & Fisher, K. (2020). A dialogical approach to understand perspectives of an aboriginal wellbeing program: An extension of Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920957495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920957495
Van de Velde, C. (2020). A global student anger? A comparative analysis of student movements in Chile (2011), Quebec (2012), and Hong-Kong (2014). Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 52(2), 289-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1763164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1763164
Van der Burg, W. (1990). Jürgen Habermas on law and morality: Some critical comments, Theory, Culture and Society, 7(4), 91-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327690007004007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026327690007004007
Willis, J., & Saunders, M. (2007). Research in a post-colonial world: The example of Australian aborigines. In M. Pitt & A. Smith (Eds.) Researching the margins (pp. 96-114). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230224476_5
Wilson, A. T., & Winiarczyk, R. E. (2014). Mixed methods research strategies with deaf people: Linguistic and cultural challenges addressed. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 266-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527943
Yahya, Y., Said, D., & Damayanti, R. A. (2021). Jurgen Habermas critical review on social and environmental accounting practices at Bakaru hydroelectric power plant. International Journal of Innovations in Engineering Research and Technology, 8(7), 270-279. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9CW6M
Zhao, Y. (2018). What works may hurt. Columbia University.
Zurn, C. F. (2003). Identity or status? Struggles over ‘recognition’ in Fraser, Honneth, and Taylor. Constellations, 10(4), 519-537. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1351-0487.2003.00351.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1351-0487.2003.00351.x
Zurn, C. F. (2005) Recognition, redistribution and democracy: Dilemmas of Honneth’s critical social theory. European Journal of Philosophy, 13(1), 89-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0966-8373.2005.00223.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0966-8373.2005.00223.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Mixed Methods Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
