Advancing Mixed Methods Research in JOMES Issue 10
Abstract views: 12 / PDF downloads: 13
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59455/jomes.58Abstract
Abstract
In this10 issue, JOMES proudly presents,
A blend of insights, transformative and immense.
With themes of integration and change in view,
These articles inspire both the old and the new.
In Article 1, a poetic call takes flight,
Abstracts as verse, both rigorous and light.
Onwuegbuzie urges a scholarly turn,
Where emotion and intellect together burn.
The second article casts an educational lens,
Twenty years of trends it comprehends.
Meng and Wang map mixed methods’ growth,
Through bibliometric tools, they offer both.
In Article 3, resilience takes the stage,
For Angolan farmers facing climate's rage.
Vinevala’s team blends qualitative might,
With surveys to craft solutions in sight.
The fourth article dives into critical thought,
Morrison applies theories that Habermas brought.
From ideology critique to social justice frames,
Transformative aims are the research’s claims.
In Article 5, quantitizing expands its role,
Onwuegbuzie explores how to measure the whole.
Item response theory gives mixed methods new grace,
Bringing precision to themes with a measured embrace.
The sixth article gives voice to the young,
Kara, Çetin, and their team show where sustainability’s sung.
From zero-waste lessons in children’s domain,
To community impact, their insights sustain.
Together these works weave a theme profound,
Integration and transformation resound.
With rigor and creativity interlaced,
JOMES redefines how challenges are faced.
References
Kara, S., Çetin, P. S., Kara, Y. C., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2024). Little voices, big impact: Exploring primary school children’s perceptions of zero waste. Journal of Mixed Method Studies, 9(2), 126-190. https://doi.org/10.59455/jomes.55
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2024a). Abstracts as poetry in journal articles: A call for a new paradigm in scholarly communication. Journal of Mixed Method Studies, 9(2), 3-10.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2024b). Just when you thought that quantitizing merely involved counting: A renewed call for expanding the practice of quantitizing in mixed methods research with a focus on measurement-based quantitizing. Journal of Mixed Method Studies, 9(2), 76-125. https://doi.org/10.59455/jomes.54
Meng, Z., & Wang, P. (2024). Research on mixed methods in education: A bibliometric analysis of development dynamics (2003 - 2023). Journal of Mixed Method Studies, 9(2), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.59455/jomes.38
Morrison, K. (2024). Habermas, Honneth, critical theory, and ideology critique for transformative mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Method Studies, 9(2), 49-75. https://doi.org/10.59455/jomes.53
Vinevala, J., Halcro, K., & Acharyya, M. (2024). An exploratory sequential mixed methods research design to evaluate stakeholders' perspectives in promoting Angola small-scale farmers' resilience to climate change. Journal of Mixed Method Studies, 9(2), 28-48, https://doi.org/10.59455/jomes.41
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Mixed Methods Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.